This site may earn chapter commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

I7vsi5

Whether you lot're building your next PC or shopping for a new computer online, ane of the questions that comes upwards from fourth dimension to fourth dimension is whether the Intel Core i5 or Core i7 is a better deal. The brusque respond, "It depends," isn't all that helpful, so we've broken the information out in more detail and for both mobile and desktop processors.

Desktop Core i5 vs. Core i7

Intel'south October 2017 update to the Core i5 (see on Amazon) and Cadre i7 (run across on Amazon) were the outset major shift in core counts since Sandy Bridge in 2011. For the by six years, Intel's Core i5 family has offered four cores without Hyper-Threading, and the Core i7 family offered iv cores with Hyper-Threading. Hyper-Threading allows two simultaneous "virtual" cores for each concrete core and shares the workload between them.

The 8th-generation CPUs that Intel introduced in October 2017 increased the number of cores and threads within each of these families by 50 pct, and in the Core i7-8700K's instance, increased the core's clock speed besides. Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs with model numbers commencement with an viii (similar the Cadre i7-8700K) now accept six cores, or six cores + Hyper-Threading.

Intel-8thGen

Intel'south new 8th-gen processor lineup

Intel's eighth-generation CPUs are more often than not more expensive than the CPUs they replace, though this varies somewhat. The overall cost of CPUs in these segments has still come down on a per-core footing, and the performance boost from the boosted cores is oft worth it. If you aren't sure what generation of Intel CPU you have, the first digit of the four-digit model code is the model number. If you lot have a Core i7-2600K, the "two" means this CPU is a second-generation Cadre i7 CPU, aka Sandy Span.

Intel's decision to heave core counts across all three desktop CPU segments–the Core i3 also gets ii cores and loses Hyper-Threading for a 4C/4T configuration–makes this an attractive time to purchase. How much benefit you'll see from upgrading depends to some extent on how much multi-threading your typical games or applications use and how sometime your current chip is. While in that location are still some single or dual-core applications out there, Windows is designed to spread multiple single-threaded workloads across multiple cores. A dual-core and quad-core awarding running at the same fourth dimension volition scale much better on the new Core i5 as opposed to the older variants.

While Microsoft'southward DirectX xi isn't very proficient at taking advantage of multiple CPU cores, games tin can yet use a generally single-threaded approach for rendering while spinning audio, AI, and/or data loading on to their own threads. Gamers who stream and play games simultaneously from a single system may besides find a half-dozen-core Cadre i5 much amend-suited to the task than the 7th generation and earlier processors.

[metaslider id=236059]

If all yous care about is gaming and yous don't run any other workloads outside the game, an 8th-generation Core i5 won't deliver much in the way of near-term benefits compared to the recent quad-core fries. Games don't typically scale very much past four cores (4C/4T, as opposed to 2C/4T), though the newer DirectX 12 API could make gaming more multi-core friendly in the long term. If you're a gamer on a 6th-or-7th-generation Core i5, an 8th-generation chip probably won't improve your game performance much at the moment. If you're going to upgrade no affair what, nosotros'd recommend a newer, six-core i5 over the older quad-core variant. While I don't generally recommend trying to "future proof" a organization–it'south ofttimes non worth the premium y'all pay–CPUs now terminal long enough to make ownership a core with an eye towards the hereafter a reasonable decision.

i3-i5-i7-2

Intel'southward new boxed packaging for the Core i3, i5, and i7 processors.

The 8th-generation Core i5 is a strong selection for anyone who needs to balance multi-threaded operation, clock speed, and cost. It won't friction match the Core i7 in 3D rendering tests, video editing, or video encoding, only it'll be just equally fast as an equivalently-clocked Core i7 in games or in lightly threaded applications like Photoshop. Having six cores gives yous some leg room if newer games begin taking better reward of multi-threading. Alternately, it should besides brand it easier to stream and game on the same organisation, though I'd recommend consulting a separate guide that tests this use-example specifically earlier deciding on an 8th-generation i5 versus an i7.

The 8th-gen Core i7's six cores and 12 threads are great for buyers who tin take advantage of them. While Intel has been selling six-core CPUs for years, previous six-core chips were more expensive than the Core i7-8700K's $359 MSRP, required generally more expensive motherboards, and required end-users to trade clock speed for cadre counts. Information technology's important, however, to brand certain your applications tin can take advantage of all six cores and 12 threads before pulling the trigger on an 8700K.

What About Six-Core HEDT Customers?

Intel's High Cease DeskTop market segment is, as the name suggests, Intel'south highest-stop official desktop segment. These fries typically don't back up as much RAM every bit their Xeon counterparts and may lack other features similar ECC RAM compatibility, just they historically offer more cores and threads than Intel'due south mainstream Core i7s. For simplicity'south sake, we're only comparison six-core HEDT processors against the Core i7-8700K. While Intel has previously sold HEDT CPUs with 8-10 CPU cores, we tin can't make a uncomplicated rule of thumb for when an older HEDT CPU with a higher cadre count would be superior to the narrower, faster, Core i7-8700K.

If yous're using an early HEDT model, like the Core i7-3930K or Core i7-4930K, the 8700K will definitely be a step up. Both of those CPUs had all-cadre turbo clocks that were well beneath the Core i7-8700K's iv.3GHz all-core frequency, and they used older, less-efficient architectures. Betwixt the eighth-generation Core i7's college clock speed and higher efficiency, you can reasonably await to run into a one.2x to 1.4x performance comeback depending on the workload, how high your previous CPU additional under full load, and whether your applications accept advantage of SIMD instruction sets similar AVX2. Retentivity bandwidth-sensitive applications should also see a significant heave from the transition from DDR3-1600 to DDR4-2666. The age of your current HEDT system will affair significantly; customers with a 7800X or 6800K probably won't meet a benefit, while those with systems from the Ivy Span era or earlier volition see significant, though not earth-shattering improvements.

If you're one of the relative scattering of customers using Intel'southward first-generation vi-core architecture, codenamed Westmere, you should definitely see a major performance boost from upgrading to the 8700K. Intel's highest-end Westmere CPUs had full-core boosts beneath 3.7GHz in all cases and the old Nehalem compages was markedly less efficient than Intel's second-generation architecture, Sandy Span. Westmere also lacked back up for capabilities like AVX and AVX2. The Core i7-8700K is clocked i.3x higher than the old Core i7-980 and should offer at to the lowest degree one.15x higher operation from architectural improvements alone. A 1.45x to 1.6x operation comeback from Westmere to Coffee Lake wouldn't surprise u.s..

Putting It All Together

Intel's decision to innovate college core counts across its unabridged production stack means at that place's some theoretical benefit to upgrading, even if y'all own a 7th generation CPU already. For practical purposes, however, we're going to presume that almost customers with a sixth-generation or 7th-generation CPU aren't interested in buying a new motherboard and CPU and so soon after their last update.

[metaslider id=257158]

Nosotros've thrown a lot of numbers and figures at this article, only don't worry if you lot're caput is spinning a bit trying to proceed it all straight. The slideshow above includes a number of charts intended to make it easier to grasp the improvements and value of upgrading depending on your current situation and product family.

Mobile Processors (8th Generation)

Up until August 2017, Intel's mobile products were by and large dual cores beyond the entire Core i3 / i5 / i7 production stack. There were a scattering of quad-core parts in the Core i7 family, but about of Intel'south mobile fries were 2C/4T configurations, with quad-cadre chips reserved for 45W TDPs and higher up. As of now, Intel offers a handful of quad-core Core i7 and Cadre i5 CPUs. One major difference between these Core i5 chips and Intel'due south unabridged previous lineup of Core i5 mobile processors is that the Core i5-8250U and Cadre i5-8350U do back up Hyper-Threading. The Core i7 8650U and Core i7-8550U are also quad-core / eight-thread designs.

8th-Gen

Click to enlarge

Unfortunately, reviews of laptops that actually use these chips are nonetheless pretty few and far between, and Intel gives laptop manufacturers more elbowroom to specify their ain desired operating temperatures and thermal limits in ways that can introduce substantial variation betwixt unlike machines that ostensibly use the same processor. The early information on these chips suggests that they're faster than the old dual-core variants, despite having much lower base clock speeds to compensate for the increased core and thread count, but no 1 has yet written a major review of any eighth-generation mobile system. None of the mobile CPUs announced thus far offer the onboard EDRAM cache that significantly improves Intel's onboard graphics functioning, either, while there are multiple 7th-generation SKUs that exercise.

Mobile Cadre i5 vs. Mobile Core i7 (7th Generation and Previous)

Mobile users have three singled-out choices to make, which clouds the issue a flake. In that location are previous-generation Core M chips as well as Cadre i7 and i5 processors. The Cadre M chips are limited to the m3 family–Intel has taken what used to be a distinct brand and folded it into the Cadre i7 and Core i5 families instead. This creates situations similar the one shown below.

Corei7-Comparison

These two chips look similar, with the same cache, almost the same clock speed, and similar GPUs–but they have dissimilar operating TDPs and hence offer different user experiences. Exactly how unlike isn't something we can speak to without test hardware, simply by systems showed marked variation depending on OEM blueprint and thermal limits. Core Grand launched in 2014 but never sold particularly well–OEMs often saddle the processors with ambitious loftier-resolution displays and extremely thin chassis, leading to mediocre battery life.

The Cadre i5 is in a similar situation:

CoreM-Comparison

If you're looking at the Core M-branded Core i5, nosotros strongly recommend doing your homework and checking reviews of specific systems. Core Yard systems can deliver better battery life than their i5/i7 counterparts, but this will depend on the specifics of the manufacturer. Remember, high-resolution screens and ultra-thin systems with limited bombardment life will toll you simply as much in power savings every bit yous can get with a lower-TDP CPU–possibly more than these days, since loftier-stop chips account for a decreasing corporeality of power consumption.

The other major difference we want to discuss is the gap betwixt seventh generation Core i7 and i5 core counts on mobile. Prior to Skylake (sixth gen), almost all Intel fries on mobile were dual-core below the Core i7 level. There are a few 6th and seventh generation Core i5 mobile parts that offer quad cores without Hyper-Threading back up, every bit shown below:

Intel-Core-i5-Mobile

The departure betwixt these 3 cores is that i of them supports Intel's Iris Pro Graphics, while the other two are Intel HD Graphics-but. The Iris Pro 580 is Intel's only EDRAM-equipped 128MB Core i5. If you want a mobile processor with height-end graphics and a quad-cadre CPU, this is the Core i5 you want to purchase.

Outside of these three cores, the general rule does withal follow. Most mobile Core i5 and all Core i3 processors are dual-core with Hyper-Threading. Here are the features that separate mobile Core i5 and Cadre i7 processors in 7th generation processors and below:

More cores: Many of Intel'due south Core i7 processors are quad-core chips with Hyper-Threading enabled. This isn't universal, however, and the company does offering a few dual-core + Hyper-Threading SKUs.

Higher clocks: Intel'southward dual-core mobile Core i7 fries typically accept higher clock speeds than their Core i5 counterparts, fifty-fifty at the same TDP.

More than cache: Core i7 chips carry either 6MB or 4MB of enshroud. Core i5 chips run the gamut hither. Older chips (pre-Broadwell) frequently bear 3MB, while Skylake and Kaby Lake fries are sometimes 4-6MB. The actress cache has only a small bear upon on operation.

More addressable memory: Many older mobile Core i7 and i5 processors are limited to 16GB of memory, only there are Skylake (6th-gen) chips that support 32GB and even 64GB on some late Core i5 / i7 models. 16GB of RAM is fine for the vast majority of users. But if you lot think you might demand more than, bank check what your CPU is capable of at Intel's database.

How much performance you get out of a mobile Core i5 versus a Cadre i7 will depend a great deal on your laptop's cooling solution and whether the chip tin handle its own rut output. We've previously discussed how Intel gave OEMs more freedom to define their own TDP targets and skin temperatures. But this creates scenarios in which buying a faster Core Chiliad can actually consequence in worse operation, every bit the flake hits its thermal trip indicate and down-throttles to go on absurd.

Intel's highest-end Iris Pro graphics are available in both Core i5 and Core i7 mobile SKUs

Intel'south highest-stop Iris Pro graphics are available in both Cadre i5 and Core i7 mobile SKUs

We can't point to specific instances where this has tilted performance between Core i5 and Core i7 chips, but it'south likely to create at least a footling "slosh" between the two core families. Generally speaking, if you lot truly want to emphasize low ability, choice the CPU that has lower base and turbo clocks. Intel historically defined TDP as "The CPU'southward boilerplate ability consumption when running typical workloads over a period of time." A flake with more than headroom is a chip that'll striking its throttle point faster.

Which CPU Should You lot Buy?

If you're looking at the mobile market, we'd recommend a newer 8th Gen quad core over a dual-core CPU. If you're in the market for a desktop chip, on the other hand, the decision is fairly straightforward. Gamers and enthusiasts who want to balance high cadre counts and frequencies with a price below $300 should find the new Core i5 fries right upwards their alley. But those looking for budget workstation functioning or similarly demanding applications volition benefit from the Core i7-8700K, but these workloads will be faster on Intel's 8th-generation Coffee Lake than on any previous part. HEDT customers with older Westmere-era hardware should do good a great deal from these improvements.

Now Read: How to purchase the right video carte du jour for your gaming PC, Best Graphics Cards for Every Budget, and The Worst CPUs Always Made

Check out our ExtremeTech Explains series for more in-depth coverage of today's hottest tech topics.